Bibliographische Detailangaben
Beteiligte: Hall, Jeffrey A, Merolla, Andy J
In: Human Communication Research, 46, 2020, 1, S. 86-111
veröffentlicht:
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 86-111
ISSN: 0360-3989
1468-2958
DOI: 10.1093/hcr/hqz014
veröffentlicht in: Human Communication Research
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: Oxford University Press (OUP) (CrossRef)
Inhaltsangabe

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Theoretical explanations for associations between characteristics of social interactions and global well-being (e.g., life satisfaction, loneliness) require further development and empirical grounding. We used the Communicate Bond Belong theory to develop six hypotheses linking the frequency, type, relatedness-to-energy ratio, and volition/choice of everyday social interactions with global well-being. Hypotheses were tested using two experience sampling studies and one 28-day diary study (TotalN = 389; Totalobservations = 10,368). Results suggest that number of social interactions is associated with global well-being, and that the portion of interactions with close partners is associated with lower loneliness. Experiencing unsatiated social needs when alone was negatively associated with global well-being and greater interaction choice was positively associated with global well-being. This study contributes to the ongoing discussion about how the pattern and nature of daily sociability are reflective of human thriving.</jats:p>