Bibliographische Detailangaben
In: Management Communication Quarterly, 32, 2018, 3, S. 465-465
veröffentlicht:
SAGE Publications
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 465-465
ISSN: 0893-3189
1552-6798
DOI: 10.1177/0893318918774862
veröffentlicht in: Management Communication Quarterly
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: SAGE Publications (CrossRef)
Inhaltsangabe

<jats:p> Brummans, B. H. J. M. (2015). Forum introduction: Organizational communication and the question of agency. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(3), 458-462. DOI: 10.1177/0893318915584823 </jats:p><jats:p> The author regrets that there is a spelling error in the second paragraph of page 458 of this forum introduction. Line 7 should read as follows (the change is shown in bold): </jats:p><jats:p> Drawing on actor-network theory as well as Bakhtinian dialogism, among other intellectual traditions, Cooren looks at agency through a ventriloquial lens to understand how language and action are always inhabited by passions and principles that make themselves heard and felt in interactions and thus shape our organizing. </jats:p><jats:p> Also, on page 459, third paragraph, line 18 should read: </jats:p><jats:p> And if the same newspaper states, “The Chinese Government said today . . . “ or “Google said . . .,” we usually glance over the fact that the Chinese Government or Google cannot speak for themselves without their spokespersons—or the fact that the New York Times cannot state anything without journalists writing on its behalf (see also McPhee’s essay). </jats:p>