Bibliographische Detailangaben
Beteiligte: Corman, Steven R.
In: Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20, 2006, 3, S. 325-338
veröffentlicht:
SAGE Publications
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 325-338
ISSN: 1050-6519
1552-4574
DOI: 10.1177/1050651906287256
veröffentlicht in: Journal of Business and Technical Communication
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: SAGE Publications (CrossRef)
Inhaltsangabe

<jats:p> This commentary reflects on Mumby and Stohl's essay “Disciplining Organizational Communication Studies.” The author argues that Mumby and Stohl's desire to create a “birth” story for the discipline caused them to overlook two important trends among its scholars that may work to undermine the discipline's relevance: overvaluing theory relative to the empirical study of communication behavior and resisting technology both as a subject and a tool. Organizational communication scholars should work against tendencies to maintain the currency of their research enterprise. </jats:p>