Beteiligte: | , |
---|---|
In: | Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24, 2010, 2, S. 206-233 |
veröffentlicht: |
SAGE Publications
|
Medientyp: | Artikel, E-Artikel |
Umfang: | 206-233 |
---|---|
ISSN: |
1050-6519
1552-4574 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1050651909353304 |
veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Business and Technical Communication |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Schlagwörter: | |
Kollektion: | SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
<jats:p> Many students see instructor commentary as not constructive but prescriptive directions that must be followed so that their grade, not necessarily their writing, can be improved. Research offering heuristics for improving such commentary is available for guidance, but the methods employed to comment on writing still have not changed significantly, primarily because we lack sufficient understanding of how students use feedback. Usability evaluation is ideally equipped for assessing how students use commentary and how instructors might adapt their comments to make them more usable. This article reports on usability testing of commentary provided to students in an introductory technical writing course. </jats:p> |