Beteiligte: | , |
---|---|
In: | Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85, 2008, 4, S. 860-877 |
veröffentlicht: |
SAGE Publications
|
Medientyp: | Artikel, E-Artikel |
Umfang: | 860-877 |
---|---|
ISSN: |
2161-430X
1077-6990 |
DOI: | 10.1177/107769900808500409 |
veröffentlicht in: | Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Schlagwörter: | |
Kollektion: | SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
<jats:p> This large-scale study investigates how intermedia agenda-setting effects are moderated by five factors: (1) lag length; (2) medium type; (3) language/institutional barriers; (4) issue type; and (5) election or non-election context. Longitudinal analyses of daily attention to twenty-five issues in nine Belgian media across eight years demonstrate that (1) intermedia agenda setting is mainly a short-term process; (2) newspapers have stronger influence on television than vice versa; (3) language/institutional barriers suppress influence; (4) size of influence differs across types of issues; and (5) intermedia agenda setting is largely absent during election times. </jats:p> |