Scandal 2.0 : How Valenced Reader Comments Affect Recipients’ Perception of Scandalized Individuals...
How Valenced Reader Comments Affect Recipients’ Perception of Scandalized Individuals and the Journalistic Quality of Online...

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Titel: Scandal 2.0 : How Valenced Reader Comments Affect Recipients’ Perception of Scandalized Individuals and the Journalistic Quality of Online News; How Valenced Reader Comments Affect Recipients’ Perception of Scandalized Individuals and the Journalistic Quality of Online News
Beteiligte: von Sikorski, Christian, Hänelt, Maria
In: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93, 2016, 3, S. 551-571
veröffentlicht:
SAGE Publications
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 551-571
ISSN: 1077-6990
2161-430X
DOI: 10.1177/1077699016628822
veröffentlicht in: Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: SAGE Publications (CrossRef)
Inhaltsangabe

<jats:p> Previous research shows that one-sided and uncivil reader comments posted below professionally edited online news articles may affect a recipient’s perception of the specific issue at hand. However, it remains largely unclear whether specific comments affect a reader’s perception of an individual actor depicted in an online news article. An online experiment showed substantial effects (e.g., attitudes, perceived responsibility, perceived opinion climate) of valenced reader comments on a recipient’s evaluation of a scandalized financial manager depicted in connection with a mediated financial scandal. Furthermore, recipients’ perceived journalistic quality of the article itself was affected by specific reader comments. </jats:p>