| Beteiligte: | , |
|---|---|
| In: | Discourse Studies, 9, 2007, 2, S. 276-282 |
| veröffentlicht: |
SAGE Publications
|
| Medientyp: | Artikel, E-Artikel |
| Umfang: | 276-282 |
|---|---|
| ISSN: |
1461-4456
1461-7080 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/1461445607075348 |
| veröffentlicht in: | Discourse Studies |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Schlagwörter: | |
| Kollektion: | SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
<jats:p>Open-ended interviews remain the default data generation technique for qualitative psychology and sociology. This commentary raises questions with Griffin's understanding of naturalistic materials and the emic/ etic distinction. It reiterates problems in the use of open-ended interviews, and repeats the case for more considered support for their use.</jats:p> |