Bibliographische Detailangaben
Beteiligte: Gomez‐Lavin, Javier, Rachar, Matthew
In: Mind & Language, 34, 2019, 1, S. 97-120
veröffentlicht:
Wiley
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 97-120
ISSN: 0268-1064
1468-0017
DOI: 10.1111/mila.12195
veröffentlicht in: Mind & Language
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: Wiley (CrossRef)
Inhaltsangabe

<jats:p>The debate regarding the nature of joint action has come to a stalemate due to a dependence on intuitional methods. Normativists, such as Margaret Gilbert, argue that action‐relative normative relations are inherent in joint action, while non‐normativists, such as Michael Bratman, claim that there are minimal cases of joint action without normative relations. In this work, we describe the first experimental examinations of these intuitions, and report the results of six studies that weigh in favor of the normativist paradigm. Philosophical ramifications and further extensions of this work are then discussed.</jats:p>