Bibliographische Detailangaben
Beteiligte: Borg, Emma, Harrison, Richard, Stazicker, James, Salomons, Tim
In: Mind & Language, 35, 2020, 1, S. 29-47
veröffentlicht:
Wiley
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 29-47
ISSN: 1468-0017
0268-1064
DOI: 10.1111/mila.12227
veröffentlicht in: Mind & Language
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: Wiley (CrossRef)
Inhaltsangabe

<jats:p>Philosophers often assume that folk hold pain to be a mental state. However, folk also assign pains bodily locations: unlike most other mental states, pains are held to exist in arms, feet, etc. This has led some to talk of the “paradox of pain,” whereby the folk notion of pain is inherently conflicted. Recently, several authors have rejected the paradox view, arguing for a univocal, Bodily view of the folk notion of pain. This paper presents six objections to the Bodily view. We then outline a direction for future research—the “Polyeidic approach”—whereby the folk notion of pain is held to be complex.</jats:p>