Bibliographische Detailangaben
Beteiligte: Ue, Tom
In: Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance, 11, 2018, 2, S. 217-225
veröffentlicht:
Intellect
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 217-225
ISSN: 1753-6421
1753-643X
DOI: 10.1386/jafp.11.2.217_1
veröffentlicht in: Journal of Adaptation in Film & Performance
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: Intellect (CrossRef)
Inhaltsangabe

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>The start of George Orwell’s Animal Farm: A Fairy Story (1945) finds an assembly of animals gathered to hear the strange dream that Old Major had the night before. The 12-year-old boar prefaces his narrative with a polemic against the miserable and toilsome lives that they are living in Manor Farm: ‘No animal in England knows the meaning of happiness or leisure after he is a year old. No animal in England is free. The life of an animal is misery and slavery: that is the plain truth’ (5). Orwell traces the resultant revolution, revealing some of its flaws while resisting a monocausal reading for its failure. In what follows, I discuss this play with its most recent adaptor, Toronto-based theatre artist Anthony MacMahon. We examine the novella’s resonance in the twenty-first century, and analyse the adaptation’s treatment of, and response to, Orwell.</jats:p>