Beteiligte: | |
---|---|
In: | Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 25, 1995, 1, S. 101-106 |
veröffentlicht: |
SAGE Publications
|
Medientyp: | Artikel, E-Artikel |
Umfang: | 101-106 |
---|---|
ISSN: |
0047-2816
1541-3780 |
DOI: | 10.2190/mjke-e8yq-6u6l-xarv |
veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Technical Writing and Communication |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Schlagwörter: | |
Kollektion: | SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
<jats:p> This study surveys scientific and technical communicators to determine their perceptions of their role as interviewees in the performance appraisal interview. The results reveal that interviewees think the appraisal process is unreliable and invalid, that managers do not stimulate growth and development in the appraisal interview, and that subordinates have little influence concerning what goes on in the department. Other results are discussed in the article. </jats:p> |