Beteiligte: | |
---|---|
In: | Canadian Journal of Communication, 17, 1992, 1 |
veröffentlicht: |
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
|
Medientyp: | Artikel, E-Artikel |
ISSN: |
0705-3657
1499-6642 |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.22230/cjc.1992v17n1a647 |
veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Journal of Communication |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Schlagwörter: | |
Kollektion: | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (CrossRef) |
<jats:p> The development of Canadian broadcast policy and law respecting “content balance” (and corollary notions of public “access and reply” entitlements, “abusive speech,” and “controversial issues of public importance”) exhibits significant definitional vagueness and discontinuity. The authors summarize the history of policy making in the area, and provide two case studies: one of religious television broadcasting, one of community radio broadcasting. These materials lead them to reject the notion of content balance as an element of regulatory terminology. </jats:p> |