Bibliographische Detailangaben
Beteiligte: Barry, Thomas E.
In: Journal of Advertising, 4, 1975, 4, S. 15-20
veröffentlicht:
Board of Directors, American Academy of Advertising
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 15-20
ISSN: 0091-3367
1557-7805
veröffentlicht in: Journal of Advertising
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: sid-55-col-jstorbusiness
sid-55-col-jstoras6
sid-55-col-jstorbusiness2archive
JSTOR Business & Economics
JSTOR Arts & Sciences VI Archive
JSTOR Business II Archive
Inhaltsangabe

<p>A strategy of advertising being used more and more frequently today, particularly in print and TV, is comparative advertising--the explicit verbal and/or visual presentation of competitor's names in the message. Although never banned, comparative advertising has historically been frowned upon particularly by the three major television networks. However, in early 1972 the Federal Trade Commission came out in favor of comparative advertising, and there has been a dramatic increase in its use in the past three years. There are many questions generated by a comparative advertising strategy. For example, "Is comparative advertising simply a comparison strategy or is it disparagement?" "Is it believable?" "Will it propogate more FTC regulation?" This article presents a perspective for comparative advertising and raises issues concerning its appropriateness for marketing managers.</p>