Intrinsic vs. Image-Related Utility in Social Media: Why Do People Contribute Content to Twitter?

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Beteiligte: Toubia, Olivier, Stephen, Andrew T.
In: Marketing Science, 32, 2013, 3, S. 368-392
veröffentlicht:
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 368-392
ISSN: 0732-2399
1526-548X
veröffentlicht in: Marketing Science
Sprache: Englisch
Inhaltsangabe

<p>We empirically study the motivations of users to contribute content to social media in the context of the popular microblogging site Twitter. We focus on noncommercial users who do not benefit financially from their contributions. Previous literature suggests that there are two main types of utility that motivate these users to post content: intrinsic utility and image-related utility. We leverage the fact that these two types of utility give rise to different predictions as to whether users should increase their contributions when their number of followers increases. To address the issue that the number of followers is endogenous, we conducted a field experiment in which we exogenously added followers (or follow requests, in the case of protected accounts) to a set of users over a period of time and compared their posting activities to those of a control group. We estimated each treated user's utility function using a dynamic discrete choice model. Although our results are consistent with both types of utility being at play, our model suggests that image-related utility is larger for most users. We discuss the implications of our findings for the evolution of Twitter and the type of value firms may derive from such platforms in the future.</p>