Titel: | Rational Versus Intuitive Processing : The Impact of Cognitive Load and Moral Salience on In-Game Aggression and Feelings of Guilt; The Impact of Cognitive Load and Moral Salience on In-Game Aggression and Feelings of Guilt |
---|---|
Beteiligte: | , |
In: | Journal of Media Psychology, 31, 2019, 1, S. 2-11 |
veröffentlicht: |
Hogrefe Publishing Group
|
Medientyp: | Artikel, E-Artikel |
Umfang: | 2-11 |
---|---|
ISSN: |
1864-1105
2151-2388 |
DOI: | 10.1027/1864-1105/a000215 |
veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Media Psychology |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Schlagwörter: | |
Kollektion: | Hogrefe Publishing Group (CrossRef) |
<jats:p> Abstract. This study explored two main theoretical propositions. First, we tested Hartmann’s (2011 , 2012 ) notion that video games are processed via two separate cognitive systems: System 1, the automatic system, and System 2, the rational system. Specifically, we used a cognitive load manipulation to test if intuitive moral responses such as guilt and anthropomorphism are processed in System 1. Second, we utilized moral foundations theory to test the effect of care salience on guilt and in-game aggression. Using an experimental design ( n = 94), the results indicate that under conditions of cognitive load, players had somewhat lower in-game aggression. Effects on guilt and anthropomorphism were in the same direction, albeit with small effects. In terms of moral foundations, we found that care salience was not negatively related to in-game aggression but was directly related to guilt, indicating that greater emphasis on the moral foundation of care resulted in greater guilt. Also, anthropomorphism was positively related to experienced guilt and negatively related to in-game aggression. </jats:p> |