Inequality is Always in the Room: Language & Power in Deliberative Democracy

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Authors and Corporations: Lupia, Arthur, Norton, Anne
In: Daedalus, 146, 2017, 3, p. 64-76
published:
MIT Press - Journals
Media Type: Article, E-Article

Not logged in

further information
Physical Description: 64-76
ISSN: 0011-5266
1548-6192
DOI: 10.1162/daed_a_00447
published in: Daedalus
Language: English
Subjects:
Collection: MIT Press - Journals (CrossRef)
Table of Contents

<jats:p> Deliberative democracy has the potential to legitimize collective decisions. Deliberation's legitimating potential, however, depends on whether those who deliberate truly enter as equals, whether they are able to express on equal terms their visions of the common good, and whether the forms and practices that govern deliberative assemblies advance or undermine their goals. Here, we examine these sources of deliberation's legitimating potential. We contend that even in situations of apparent procedural equality, deliberation's legitimating potential is limited by its potential to increase normatively focal power asymmetries. We conclude by describing how deliberative contexts can be modified to reduce certain types of power asymmetries, such as those often associated with gender, race, or class. In so doing, we hope to help readers consider a broader range of factors that influence the outcomes of attempts to restructure power relationships through communicative forums. </jats:p>