Authors and Corporations: | , , |
---|---|
In: | Communication Research, 33, 2006, 4, p. 211-241 |
published: |
SAGE Publications
|
Media Type: | Article, E-Article |
Physical Description: | 211-241 |
---|---|
ISSN: |
0093-6502
1552-3810 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0093650206289148 |
published in: | Communication Research |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Collection: | SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
<jats:p>The authors define relationship talk as content messages that reference the nature of the relationship between people. They seek to contribute to the literature by (a) conceptualizing relationship talk in ways that attend to its nuances, and (b) evaluating how intimacy predicts the production and perception of relationship talk. They conducted an observational study of conversations between 120 dating couples. Length of romantic interest, compared to intimacy, was the more proximal predictor of the prominence, explicitness, depth, and negative valence of relationship talk. In general, relationship talk was positively associated with people's perceptions of the relational impact of conversation, but intimacy was unrelated to relational impact. The prominence of relationship talk noted by third-party judges was positively associated with relational impact when intimacy was low but not high. The authors discuss how their findings illuminate content messages about relationships.</jats:p> |