Bibliographische Detailangaben
Beteiligte: Cenite, Mark, Detenber, Benjamin H., Koh, Andy W.K., Lim, Alvin L.H., Ng Ee Soon
In: New Media & Society, 11, 2009, 4, S. 575-597
veröffentlicht:
SAGE Publications
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 575-597
ISSN: 1461-4448
1461-7315
DOI: 10.1177/1461444809102961
veröffentlicht in: New Media & Society
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: SAGE Publications (CrossRef)
Inhaltsangabe

<jats:p> This study explores the ethical beliefs and practices of two distinct groups of bloggers — personal and non-personal — through a worldwide web survey. A stratified purposive sample of 1224 bloggers provided information about their blogging experience, blogging habits and demographics. They were asked about their beliefs and practices for four ethical principles: truth-telling, attribution, accountability and minimizing harm. The findings reveal that the two groups differ in terms of who they are and what they do in their weblogs (blogs). In addition, there were significant differences in the extent to which they value and adhere to the four principles, and some interesting similarities. For example, both groups believe that attribution is most important and accountability least important. Scholars have proposed blogging ethics codes, and this study found that bloggers themselves support such a code. </jats:p>