Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Authors and Corporations: Waterloo, Sophie F, Baumgartner, Susanne E, Peter, Jochen, Valkenburg, Patti M
In: New Media & Society, 20, 2018, 5, p. 1813-1831
published:
SAGE Publications
Media Type: Article, E-Article

Not logged in

further information
Physical Description: 1813-1831
ISSN: 1461-4448
1461-7315
DOI: 10.1177/1461444817707349
published in: New Media & Society
Language: English
Subjects:
Collection: SAGE Publications (CrossRef)
Table of Contents

<jats:p> The main aim of this study was to examine the norms of expressing emotions on social media. Specifically, the perceived appropriateness (i.e. injunctive norms) of expressing six discrete emotions (i.e. sadness, anger, disappointment, worry, joy, and pride) was investigated across four different social media platforms. Drawing on data collected in March 2016 among 1201 young Dutch users (15–25 years), we found that positive expressions were generally perceived as more appropriate than negative expressions across all platforms. In line with the objective of the study, some platform differences were found. The expression of negative emotions was rated as most appropriate for WhatsApp, followed by Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. For positive emotion expression, perceived appropriateness was highest for WhatsApp, followed by Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Additionally, some gender differences were found, while age showed little variations. Overall, the results contribute to a more informed understanding of emotion expression online. </jats:p>