Beteiligte: | |
---|---|
In: | Discourse Studies, 14, 2012, 3, S. 345-354 |
veröffentlicht: |
SAGE Publications
|
Medientyp: | Artikel, E-Artikel |
Umfang: | 345-354 |
---|---|
ISSN: |
1461-4456
1461-7080 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1461445612441543 |
veröffentlicht in: | Discourse Studies |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Schlagwörter: | |
Kollektion: | SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
<jats:p> In this response article, I focus on two issues. First, I discuss the problem, raised by the commentators, of ‘categorial ambiguity’ in membership categorization analysis, and make suggestions about how to approach it. Second, I argue that, as conversation analysts have demonstrated the ‘systematics’ of interactional practices, membership categorization analysis should also begin to build a robust corpus of studies of ‘categorial systematics’. </jats:p> |