Bibliographische Detailangaben
Beteiligte: Stokoe, Elizabeth
In: Discourse Studies, 14, 2012, 3, S. 345-354
veröffentlicht:
SAGE Publications
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 345-354
ISSN: 1461-4456
1461-7080
DOI: 10.1177/1461445612441543
veröffentlicht in: Discourse Studies
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: SAGE Publications (CrossRef)
Inhaltsangabe

<jats:p> In this response article, I focus on two issues. First, I discuss the problem, raised by the commentators, of ‘categorial ambiguity’ in membership categorization analysis, and make suggestions about how to approach it. Second, I argue that, as conversation analysts have demonstrated the ‘systematics’ of interactional practices, membership categorization analysis should also begin to build a robust corpus of studies of ‘categorial systematics’. </jats:p>