Authors and Corporations: | |
---|---|
In: | Mind & Language, 16, 2001, 3, p. 263-283 |
published: |
Wiley
|
Media Type: | Article, E-Article |
Physical Description: | 263-283 |
---|---|
ISSN: |
0268-1064
1468-0017 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1468-0017.00169 |
published in: | Mind & Language |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Collection: | Wiley (CrossRef) |
<jats:p>A linguistic theory is correct exactly to the extent that it is the explicit statement of a body of knowledge possessed by a designated language‐user. This popular psychological conception of the goal of linguistic theorizing is commonly paired with a preference for idiolectal over social languages, where it seems to be in the nature of idiolects that the beliefs one holds about one's own are <jats:italic>ipso facto</jats:italic> correct. Unfortunately, it is also plausible that the correctness of a genuine belief cannot consist merely in that belief's being held. This paper considers how best to eliminate this tension.</jats:p> |