Bibliographische Detailangaben
Beteiligte: Leben, Derek
In: Mind & Language, 30, 2015, 1, S. 44-69
veröffentlicht:
Wiley
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 44-69
ISSN: 0268-1064
1468-0017
DOI: 10.1111/mila.12071
veröffentlicht in: Mind & Language
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: Wiley (CrossRef)
Inhaltsangabe

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Linguistic theories of lexical semantics support a Neoclassical Theory of concepts, where entities like <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">CAUSE</jats:styled-content>, <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">STATE</jats:styled-content>, and <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">MANNER</jats:styled-content> serve as necessary conditions for the possession of individual event concepts. Not all concepts have a neoclassical structure, and whether or not words participate in regular linguistic patterns such as verbal alternations will be proposed as a probe for identifying whether their corresponding concepts do indeed have such structure. I show how the Neoclassical Theory supplements existing theories of concepts and supports a version of analyticity and conceptual analysis.</jats:p>