Beteiligte: | |
---|---|
In: | Mind & Language, 33, 2018, 1, S. 34-64 |
veröffentlicht: |
Wiley
|
Medientyp: | Artikel, E-Artikel |
Umfang: | 34-64 |
---|---|
ISSN: |
0268-1064
1468-0017 |
DOI: | 10.1111/mila.12168 |
veröffentlicht in: | Mind & Language |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Schlagwörter: | |
Kollektion: | Wiley (CrossRef) |
<jats:p>Generics are exception‐admitting generalisations, which find expression in apparently diverse linguistic forms. A standard claim is that there is a hidden linguistic unity to genericity in the form of a covert operator, <jats:italic>Gen</jats:italic>. This article surveys and rejects a range of considerations that purport to show <jats:italic>Gen</jats:italic> to be syntactically essential to the explanation of a range of linguistic phenomena connected to genericity. The conclusion reached is that genericity is not a specifically linguistic property insofar as it does not supervene upon any especial linguistic device; rather, genericity supervenes on broader cognitive competencies within linguistic constraints.</jats:p> |