Bibliographische Detailangaben
Beteiligte: Collins, John
In: Mind & Language, 33, 2018, 1, S. 34-64
veröffentlicht:
Wiley
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 34-64
ISSN: 0268-1064
1468-0017
DOI: 10.1111/mila.12168
veröffentlicht in: Mind & Language
Sprache: Englisch
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: Wiley (CrossRef)
Inhaltsangabe

<jats:p>Generics are exception‐admitting generalisations, which find expression in apparently diverse linguistic forms. A standard claim is that there is a hidden linguistic unity to genericity in the form of a covert operator, <jats:italic>Gen</jats:italic>. This article surveys and rejects a range of considerations that purport to show <jats:italic>Gen</jats:italic> to be syntactically essential to the explanation of a range of linguistic phenomena connected to genericity. The conclusion reached is that genericity is not a specifically linguistic property insofar as it does not supervene upon any especial linguistic device; rather, genericity supervenes on broader cognitive competencies within linguistic constraints.</jats:p>