Bibliographic Details
Authors and Corporations: Gomez‐Lavin, Javier, Rachar, Matthew
In: Mind & Language, 34, 2019, 1, p. 97-120
published:
Wiley
Media Type: Article, E-Article

Not logged in

further information
Physical Description: 97-120
ISSN: 0268-1064
1468-0017
DOI: 10.1111/mila.12195
published in: Mind & Language
Language: English
Subjects:
Collection: Wiley (CrossRef)
Table of Contents

<jats:p>The debate regarding the nature of joint action has come to a stalemate due to a dependence on intuitional methods. Normativists, such as Margaret Gilbert, argue that action‐relative normative relations are inherent in joint action, while non‐normativists, such as Michael Bratman, claim that there are minimal cases of joint action without normative relations. In this work, we describe the first experimental examinations of these intuitions, and report the results of six studies that weigh in favor of the normativist paradigm. Philosophical ramifications and further extensions of this work are then discussed.</jats:p>