Bibliographic Details
Authors and Corporations: Giles, Timothy D.
In: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 20, 1990, 2, p. 131-138
published:
SAGE Publications
Media Type: Article, E-Article

Not logged in

further information
Physical Description: 131-138
ISSN: 0047-2816
1541-3780
DOI: 10.2190/u4ff-0l5q-fpd4-2dcj
published in: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Language: English
Subjects:
Collection: SAGE Publications (CrossRef)
Table of Contents

<jats:p> The author reviews recent articles from the technical writing literature focusing on the controversy surrounding the appropriateness of readability formulas for technical writing, an issue of immediate concern for many writers and editors. While some authorities recommend readability formulas—if the writer recognizes the formulas as a tool limited by the variables manipulated—overwhelming argument from other experts suggests that the formulas should be ignored because they can mislead writers by lulling them into a false sense of security or into writing stilted prose to fit the formula. The author suggests that further research should be conducted to study empirically how readability as a concept might be used to aid the technical writer since readability formulas are shaping computerized editing programs. </jats:p>