Beteiligte: | |
---|---|
In: | Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 15, 1985, 1, S. 15-26 |
veröffentlicht: |
SAGE Publications
|
Medientyp: | Artikel, E-Artikel |
Umfang: | 15-26 |
---|---|
ISSN: |
1541-3780
0047-2816 |
DOI: | 10.2190/hyjp-616y-f9mk-5er0 |
veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Technical Writing and Communication |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Schlagwörter: | |
Kollektion: | SAGE Publications (CrossRef) |
<jats:p> The experimental paper is conventionally organized into four sections: Introduction, Methods and Materials, Results, and Discussion. Why these particular sections? Why this particular order? My answer is that the experimental paper is an instantiation of a myth that induction is philosophically unproblematic, that it can lead unproblematically to reliable knowledge about the natural world. Because induction as a path to reliable knowledge is, in fact, problematic, scientists need to retain this myth to continue to do science undeterred by doubts concerning the value of their task. </jats:p> |