The Form of the Experimental Paper: A Realization of the Myth of Induction

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Authors and Corporations: Gross, Alan G.
In: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 15, 1985, 1, p. 15-26
published:
SAGE Publications
Media Type: Article, E-Article

Not logged in

further information
Physical Description: 15-26
ISSN: 1541-3780
0047-2816
DOI: 10.2190/hyjp-616y-f9mk-5er0
published in: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Language: English
Subjects:
Collection: SAGE Publications (CrossRef)
Table of Contents

<jats:p> The experimental paper is conventionally organized into four sections: Introduction, Methods and Materials, Results, and Discussion. Why these particular sections? Why this particular order? My answer is that the experimental paper is an instantiation of a myth that induction is philosophically unproblematic, that it can lead unproblematically to reliable knowledge about the natural world. Because induction as a path to reliable knowledge is, in fact, problematic, scientists need to retain this myth to continue to do science undeterred by doubts concerning the value of their task. </jats:p>