Bibliographic Details
Authors and Corporations: Giles, Timothy D., Still, Brian
In: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 35, 2005, 1, p. 47-70
published:
SAGE Publications
Media Type: Article, E-Article

Not logged in

further information
Physical Description: 47-70
ISSN: 0047-2816
1541-3780
DOI: 10.2190/phuc-gy8l-jrle-vmnn
published in: Journal of Technical Writing and Communication
Language: English
Subjects:
Collection: SAGE Publications (CrossRef)
Table of Contents

<jats:p> Focusing on the issue of readability, this article examines problems that readability formulas present to the technical communicator, especially in terms of interaction with government agencies, and focuses on readability formula requirements mandated by The Office of Health and Industry programs [OHIP] for medical technology product support literature. Because the Flesch Reading Ease and the Flesch-Kincaid formulas are widely available, they are probably the ones most frequently used. Contemporary readability scholars have overlooked the Golub Syntactic Density Formula, which evaluates prose according to a sentence's syntax at a deeper level than the number of words per sentence and the number of syllables per word. The authors recommend it as a tool for evaluating readability. How it might be applied with current computer applications is discussed. </jats:p>