Bibliographische Detailangaben
Beteiligte: Dallmeier-Tiessen, Sünje, Khodiyar, Varsha, Murphy, Fiona, Nurnberger, Amy, Raymond, Lisa, Whyte, Angus
In: International Journal of Digital Curation, 12, 2017, 1, S. 88-105
veröffentlicht:
Edinburgh University Library
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Nicht angemeldet

weitere Informationen
Umfang: 88-105
ISSN: 1746-8256
DOI: 10.2218/ijdc.v12i1.533
veröffentlicht in: International Journal of Digital Curation
Sprache: Unbestimmt
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: Edinburgh University Library (CrossRef)
Inhaltsangabe

<jats:p>The data curation community has long encouraged researchers to document collected research data during active stages of the research workflow, to provide robust metadata earlier, and support research data publication and preservation. Data documentation with robust metadata is one of a number of steps in effective data publication. Data publication is the process of making digital research objects ‘FAIR’, i.e. findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable; attributes increasingly expected by research communities, funders and society. Research data publishing workflows are the means to that end. Currently, however, much published research data remains inconsistently and inadequately documented by researchers. Documentation of data closer in time to data collection would help mitigate the high cost that repositories associate with the ingest process. More effective data publication and sharing should in principle result from early interactions between researchers and their selected data repository. This paper describes a short study undertaken by members of the Research Data Alliance (RDA) and World Data System (WDS) working group on Publishing Data Workflows. We present a collection of recent examples of data publication workflows that connect data repositories and publishing platforms with research activity ‘upstream’ of the ingest process. We re-articulate previous recommendations of the working group, to account for the varied upstream service components and platforms that support the flow of contextual and provenance information downstream. These workflows should be open and loosely coupled to support interoperability, including with preservation and publication environments. Our recommendations aim to stimulate further work on researchers’ views of data publishing and the extent to which available services and infrastructure facilitate the publication of FAIR data. We also aim to stimulate further dialogue about, and definition of, the roles and responsibilities of research data services and platform providers for the ‘FAIRness’ of research data publication workflows themselves.</jats:p>