Using evaluation techniques and performance claims to demonstrate public relations impact
an Australian perspective

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Beteiligte: Xavier, Robina (VerfasserIn), Johnston, Kim, Patel, Amisha, Watson, Tom, Simmons, Peter
veröffentlicht: 2005
Teil von: , Erschienen in: Public Relations Review, volume 31 / 2005, issue 3, pp. 417 – 424. [ISSN: 0363-8111; 1873-4537]
Medientyp: Artikel, E-Artikel

Get it

Diese Ressource ist frei verfügbar.
weitere Informationen
Beschreibung: freier Zugang
Umfang: 8 pp
Sprache: Englisch
Teil von: , Erschienen in: Public Relations Review, volume 31 / 2005, issue 3, pp. 417 – 424. [ISSN: 0363-8111; 1873-4537]
Schlagwörter:
Kollektion: Datenbank Internetquellen
Inhaltsangabe

"Public relations professionals use many methods to demonstrate their contribution to organizational goals, yet it is unclear how their attitudes towards evaluation and the reporting of success matches real outcomes. Ten years after the International Public Relations Association produced an evaluation gold paper, this study combines research on Australian practitioners’ evaluation practices and attitudes, and data from industry awards to identify how practitioners demonstrate their accountability. Data suggest that despite the attention paid to evaluation by the academy and industry, practitioners still focus on measuring outputs, not outcomes to demonstrate performance and continue to rely heavily on media-based evaluation methods." [Information des Anbieters]

Introduction; Methodology; Sample; Data analysis and coding; Limitations; Results; Discussion and implications; References