Using evaluation techniques and performance claims to demonstrate public relations impact
an Australian perspective

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Authors and Corporations: Xavier, Robina (Author), Johnston, Kim, Patel, Amisha, Watson, Tom, Simmons, Peter
published: 2005
Part of: , Erschienen in: Public Relations Review, volume 31 / 2005, issue 3, pp. 417 – 424. [ISSN: 0363-8111; 1873-4537]
Media Type: Article, E-Article

Get it

This resource is open access.
further information
Item Description: freier Zugang
Physical Description: 8 pp
Language: English
Part of: , Erschienen in: Public Relations Review, volume 31 / 2005, issue 3, pp. 417 – 424. [ISSN: 0363-8111; 1873-4537]
Subjects:
Collection: Datenbank Internetquellen
Table of Contents

"Public relations professionals use many methods to demonstrate their contribution to organizational goals, yet it is unclear how their attitudes towards evaluation and the reporting of success matches real outcomes. Ten years after the International Public Relations Association produced an evaluation gold paper, this study combines research on Australian practitioners’ evaluation practices and attitudes, and data from industry awards to identify how practitioners demonstrate their accountability. Data suggest that despite the attention paid to evaluation by the academy and industry, practitioners still focus on measuring outputs, not outcomes to demonstrate performance and continue to rely heavily on media-based evaluation methods." [Information des Anbieters]

Introduction; Methodology; Sample; Data analysis and coding; Limitations; Results; Discussion and implications; References