Beteiligte: | |
---|---|
veröffentlicht: | 2012 |
Teil von: |
“Dam” the Irony for The Greater Common Good; Erschienen in: International Journal of Communication, volume 6/2012, pp. 194-213, (ISSN 1932-8036)
|
Medientyp: | Website |
Beschreibung: | freier Zugang |
---|---|
Umfang: | 19 p. |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Teil von: |
“Dam” the Irony for The Greater Common Good; Erschienen in: International Journal of Communication, volume 6/2012, pp. 194-213, (ISSN 1932-8036)
|
Schlagwörter: | |
Kollektion: | Datenbank Internetquellen |
"Arundhati Roy’s essay, The Greater Common Good, frames her vehement opposition to the construction of the Narmada Dam in central India. Roy contends that the project benefited a few at the expense of India’s poor, and the protest against its construction was much more than a fight to save the river valley; it was a struggle to reinstate justice in Indian democracy. However, the pro-Narmada Dam lobby, in a formal response (by civil society activist B. G. Verghese), dismissed her contentions as antidevelopment diatribes. Exemplifying the critical trend in cultural studies, this article analyzes why Roy’s powerful criticism of Indian democracy was misread, by situating the debate in the surrounding contexts of neoliberal globalization. It argues that as texts are discursive practices, meaning is constructed, circulated, and received within specific political/economic/social circumstances and power equations."[Information des Anbieters] |
Reading texts in their contexts; Arundhati Roy’s ironic text: a pPredilection for “Pure Persuasion”; reception of argument; context of reception of the text hemegomy and myth of the middle class; conclusion; references |