Recall, Recognition and the Measurement of Memory for Print Advertisements: A Reassessment

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Authors and Corporations: Finn, Adam
In: Marketing Science, 11, 1992, 1, p. 95-100
published:
Institute of Management Sciences
Media Type: Article, E-Article

Not logged in

further information
Physical Description: 95-100
ISSN: 0732-2399
1526-548X
published in: Marketing Science
Language: English
Collection: sid-55-col-jstoras4
sid-55-col-jstorbusiness1archive
sid-55-col-jstorbusiness
JSTOR Arts & Sciences IV Archive
JSTOR Business I Archive
JSTOR Business & Economics
Table of Contents

<p>Application of the two-step approach to structural equation modeling to the PARM data studied by Bagozzi and Silk (1983) results in quite different conclusions as to the psychometric properties of recall and recognition scores. The data they analyzed are more consistent with a simple, alternative measurement model, which has different implications for the dimensionality questions Bagozzi and Silk raised. After controlling for random error, recall and recognition scores for print ads are highly correlated and yet discriminable. So, while recall and recognition have considerable common variance, the unidimensionality hypothesis is rejected. Either recall or recognition (or both) contains a significant amount of specific variance. Taking reader interest scores into account does not change the conclusion; reader interest scores are best accounted for as a lower reliability indicator of recognition.</p>